The notion of moral it is used to name the set of precepts that determine if an action can be defined as good or bad . Morality, therefore, regulates human behavior according to the norms that subjects have both good and evil.
Double , meanwhile, is a adjective which can be used with reference to the two times larger or greater, to what is repeated twice or to what implies the existence of two similar or identical elements.
The idea from double standards , within this framework, it allows to refer to the criteria used by a person or an entity when behaves in two different ways regarding the same situation . It is a injustice since it implies a violation of impartiality.
Suppose a journalist sentence harshly a fact of corruption that has as its protagonist an opposition politician, but justify or endorse the corrupt actions of a current official government . This means that, in the same case (an act of corruption), he makes two opposing judgments: he condemns the opponent and justifies the ruler. The journalist in question, therefore, has double standards.
Economic and political interests often lead to using very different rules to judge others. But double standards also exist in personal life, when we justify our reprehensible acts because we refuse to commit ourselves to those values We defend daily.
A religious minister , for example, may demand that the faithful be solidarity with those who need it most, inviting them to make donations and lead an austere life by detaching themselves from material wealth. In his private life, however, act selfishly : don't donate money No goods and lives in a mansion surrounded by luxury. The minister thus demonstrates his double standards: what he considers good for others and for the community, does not take it into account in his own existence.
The double standard can be presented in various degrees, ranging from serious signs of negligence such as those mentioned in the previous paragraphs to attitudes of little gravity in everyday life. When a person does not condemn the pranks of their children with the same severity that those of others, although they are equivalent, also evidence a double standard, although in this case the consequences are relatively mild.
Anyway, applying this duality to the upbringing of a child may seem mild in the short term but impact exponentially on their ability to discern good from evil in the future, something that may hinder their healthy developing .
The fundamental question that we must ask ourselves before this type of attitude is always the same: what is your origin ? Behind every negative trait, every crime and act of violence, there is a story, probably similar to what the subject has written. This does not mean that we should accept abuse simply because the perpetrators have been victims in the past; On the contrary, instead of simply accepting the facts, we can try to reach the point at which the person began to twist, to learn more about himself, ourselves and our species in general.
Up to a certain point, double standards can be part of the natural tendency to defend our pack : We don't like others talking badly about ours, and that need to protect them can often lead us to "make up" their mistakes. But when the actions we cover up are of a certain gravity, everything changes, especially if our negligence It can harm a third party.